Wizard magazine's top 100 greatest villains ever list.

[SuperXAsh]

Gor: That's funny, I was always under the impression that they, Great Whites and Orcas, both pretty much hunt each other at any given opportunity. e_e

Specially so when said shark is 25ft long.

[Mecha74]

And movies are, *gasp!* ment to get away from reality!

Some...not all.

[Gorjirus]

Originally Posted by BS Digital Q

The ****? Where did I post that?

My bad, that was SXA.

Originally Posted by SuperXAsh

Gor: That's funny, I was always under the impression that they, Great Whites and Orcas, both pretty much hunt each other at any given opportunity. e_e

Specially so when said shark is 25ft long.

No, not really. It's pretty much one way.

And I'd put a pack of Orca's over one shark.

But didn't we have a thread about that already?

[Orga777]

Originally Posted by alienhulk2099

And movies are, *gasp!* ment to get away from reality!

..... If everyone had your taste in movies we would all be drooling mindless masses. People actually like to think when they go into a movie you know.

It is people like you that is the reason the American movie business is the way it is. People go see the next crap film to have their brain leak out their ears making companies a lot of money so they can continue to be nothing more than films for insulation on a comatose audience.

He got caught.

Your point?

That makes him a villian, not the cannibalism (which is all I've seen the guy do)?

Do you, ya know, see how he acts?

So winning an oscar automatically makes the character that person plays a better hero/villian. Riiiiiiiiiiiiight.

He was on screen for 15 minutes dude. His performance was so chilling in just 15 minutes that he was remembered more than anybody else in the film. Do you know how to pay attention?

[alienhulk2099]

..... If everyone had your taste in movies we would all be drooling mindless masses

And we wouldn't be human at all, we all have to be different.

It is people like you that is the reason the American movie business is the way it is.

And that's bad because............

People go see the next crap film to have their brain leak out their ears

Physically that is impossible, if the brain really leaked out of the ears we would all be dead. If you're refering to actual intelligence seeing a movie doesn't make you dumber and until I actually see medical professional statements claiming that it's too difficult to believe.

making companies a lot of money so they can continue to be nothing more than films for insulation on a comatose audience.

If the audience is in comatose how can they be transported to the theaters in the first place? Besides, without those kind of movies going to cinema just wouldn't be fun, some people DON'T want to think while watching a film, just be entertained, which is how they started out in the fist place.

Your point?

He's supposed to "blend in" and still got caught.

Do you, ya know, see how he acts?

If you know your lines, are in character, and don't stutter you can act.

He was on screen for 15 minutes dude.

And?

His performance was so chilling

And so is Nightmare on Elm Street, Amityville Horror, Jaws, Halloween, The Thing, Alien, Carrie, Cujo, and so on. You all say they're chilling and yet I've seen every single one of these films and didn't flinch. I even tried to get afraid and couldn't. If it was made before 1990 and isn't the original Ft13th it's not going to be chilling, terifying, horrifying, or scary period.

in just 15 minutes that he was remembered more than anybody else in the film.

Considering the main character was an FBI agent that got lucky and main bad guy was a serial killer that took too long to kill anything I'm not suprised.

[Orga777]

Originally Posted by alienhulk2099

And that's bad because............

Because 90% of what is released by Hollowood is garbage?

Physically that is impossible, if the brain really leaked out of the ears we would all be dead. If you're refering to actual intelligence seeing a movie doesn't make you dumber and until I actually see medical professional statements claiming that it's too difficult to believe.

I think you missed it.

If the audience is in comatose how can they be transported to the theaters in the first place?

Again, I think you missed it.

Besides, without those kind of movies going to cinema just wouldn't be fun, some people DON'T want to think while watching a film, just be entertained, which is how they started out in the fist place.

Entertainment should be good. Not garbage. I never bought into this poor reasoning. People that watch a film just to be entertained usually miss out big time. They fail to comprehend complex plots, the fail to follow stories anything more complex than mindless action and explosions, they definitely don't know what good acting is, and they can't see the underneath. I say this from experience because most of my family is the same way. And it is depressing.

Good taste is important in entertainment. Whether it is movies, books, games, or what ever. If you don't have it, then all you do is join the masses watching American Idol and other stupid reality t.v. shows or flock with the other sheep to go see Mummy 3.

And what do you mean "started out that way"? That isn't exactly true. Most of the best movies ever released came from the 30s and 40s.

He's supposed to "blend in" and still got caught.

And your point?

If you know your lines, are in character, and don't stutter you can act.

You fail. You fail miserably. You fail because you don't have a clue what you are talking about. You need so much more than that to be a good actor. That is like saying anybody could have done what Heath Ledger did as The Joker in TDK or anybody could have been Hannible Lector as well as Anthony Hopkins. You seriously need to think more before you post.

And?

It should be impossible to get any Academy Award for acting when you are on screen for less than a half hour maybe?

And so is Nightmare on Elm Street, Amityville Horror, Jaws, Halloween, The Thing, Alien, Carrie, Cujo, and so on. You all say they're chilling and yet I've seen every single one of these films and didn't flinch. I even tried to get afraid and couldn't. If it was made before 1990 and isn't the original Ft13th it's not going to be chilling, terifying, horrifying, or scary period.

There has NOT been one scary film released in the 90s I am afraid. What? Sixth Sense? Please. Hostel? Saw? Don't make me laugh. Those films are nothing but mindless gore fests with no actual fright factor and is just a bunch of blood thrown on screen. The Ring is probably the scariest film released in the last 20 years.

Also, all those films you named are a lot scarier and have more soul than the ones I named.

Considering the main character was an FBI agent that got lucky and main bad guy was a serial killer that took too long to kill anything I'm not suprised.

....You are officially a lost cause. Go get some good taste please. And actually think before you post.

BTW, you DO know Jodie Foster won Best Actress for her performance right? And was still not as well remembered as well as a character on screen for only 15 minutes? Just making sure...

[alienhulk2099]

Because 90% of what is released by Hollowood is garbage?

You fail to explain how.

I think you missed it.

Like when you missed my point on Hannible being caught.

Entertainment should be good. Not garbage.

The one thing I agree with you on.

People that watch a film just to be entertained usually miss out big time.

On what? Boring art stuff?

They fail to comprehend complex plots, the fail to follow stories anything more complex than mindless action and explosions, they definitely don't know what good acting is

People want to be entertained, some by action and others by talk. At the end of the day who cares and why?

and they can't see the underneath

We have Wikipedia for that.

Good taste is important in entertainment.

Uh-huh.

If you don't have it, then all you do is join the masses watching American Idol and other stupid reality t.v. shows or flock with the other sheep to go see Mummy 3.

I don't watch American Idol and I like the Mummy movies because they're entertaining. The masses also hate Sci Fi channel movies, does that stop me? No. I could care less about what the masses want to see.

Most of the best movies ever released came from the 30s and 40s.

I'm pretty sure I was aiming for early silent era.

You fail. You fail miserably. You fail because you don't have a clue what you are talking about.

You're the one that wanted an answer, you got it.

That is like saying anybody could have done what Heath Ledger did as The Joker

Just be in character, know your lines, and give facial expressions. Does it really need to get anymore complex than that?

You seriously need to think more before you post.

I do every single time.

It should be impossible to get any Academy Award for acting when you are on screen for less than a half hour maybe?

If it's a comedy, action, adventure, adaption, or just plain entertaining movie people actually WANT to see it's impossible to get an acadamy award. If most people never heard of it or it didn't do as well at the box office put it in every single nomination category. So few exceptions to that rule. And yes, I've seen the oscars, that's all it is really.

There has NOT been one scary film released in the 90s I am afraid

Graveyard Shift.

Those films are nothing but mindless gore fests with no actual fight factor and is just a bunch of blood thrown on screen

You do mean fright, right? And besides, blood and disturbing images are supposed to be scary. Just for the record, no I have not seen them.

The Ring is probably the scariest film released in the last 20 years.

A girl coming out of the TV and getting a phone call saying you're going to die in a week. Seriously, get some guns with armor piercing rounds and barracade yourself in your house, how is that movie supposed to be scary again?

Go get some good taste please

Depends, where do I go?

you DO know Jodie Foster won Best Actress for her performance right?

And I could care less.


Nice way to edit while I'm posting.

Also, all those films you named are a lot scarier and have more soul than the ones I named.

Exoricst and Omen movies scary?Don't make me laugh. They have soul, but that isn't going to save a single film from being boring. And for the record I did like the original Amityville, not bashing these films.

[Orga777]

Originally Posted by alienhulk2099

You fail to explain how.

You really want a run-down on why? They are just there to make a quick buck, nobody is trying hard, the films released aren't taking any chances, they fail to be anything but garbage induced stupidity, the acting is usually sub-par, and really, Summer Blockbusters are the worst case in all of these.

Like when you missed my point on Hannible being caught.

Which I still haven't seen your point. He may have been caught, but that makes him less evil how?

On what? Boring art stuff?

...You don't deserve to watch film.

People want to be entertained, some by action and others by talk. At the end of the day who cares and why?

Except action movies can actually be entertaining and good at the same time. The first Die Hard and Lethal Weapon films for example. Or the Indiana Jones Trilogy (yeah, I don't count the new one.) But films that don't TRY like The Mummy or Starship Troopers, or anything by Michael Bay are just there ripping off everything else to draw in audiences. And the audiences are sheep that don't seem to know any better that these movies are nothing but shams to scam them out of their money.

We have Wikipedia for that.

That is like admitting you aren't smart enough. Good job there.

I don't watch American Idol and I like the Mummy movies because they're entertaining. The masses also hate Sci Fi channel movies, does that stop me? No. I could care less about what the masses want to see.

Good for you. Watching bad movies for a hobby is not really a good thing IMO.

I'm pretty sure I was aiming for early silent era.

The silent era didn't have the technology or budget to DO much more than what they did though. But gems like Nosferatu and Phantom of the Opera STILL popped up.

You're the one that wanted an answer, you got it.

It was a bad one too.

Just be in character, know your lines, and give facial expressions. Does it really need to get anymore complex than that?

This just goes to show how little you know. If acting was that easy, then we wouldn't be having this discussion. But it isn't, so you fail.

I do every single time.

Then you just don't know what you are talking about then.

If it's a comedy, action, adventure, adaption, or just plain entertaining movie people actually WANT to see it's impossible to get an acadamy award. If most people never heard of it or it didn't do as well at the box office put it in every single nomination category. So few exceptions to that rule. And yes, I've seen the oscars, that's all it is really.

Are you serious? Did Titanic, Braveheart, Silence of the Lambs, Lord of the Rings, Shindler's List, Gladiator, Forrest Gump all drop from your mind? Hell, those are just the WINNERS and not the popular nominated films and those are just the ones from the 90s on. All of which were box offices and critical successes.

It may have been that way the last couple years, but that is because people have been flocking to films that definitley don't deserve an Academy Award. Unless you think a film like Spider-Man 3 or Transformers deserves a Best Picture nomination when they most certainly DON'T compared to No Country for Old Men or There Will Be Blood.

Graveyard Shift.

Sorry, most of Stephen King films miss the mark. Carrie and Pet Sematary are still his best books turned into movies. Hell, I am not even a fan of his books personally. Also, checking RT, you are definitley in the minority in that opinion.

You do mean fright, right? And besides, blood and disturbing images are supposed to be scary. Just for the record, no I have not seen them.

Yeah. Fixed that before you posted.
Oh, and no. Blood and people getting cut up is not scary. It is just gross. I may not be a huge fan of Stephen King, but I DO like his essay book Danse Macbre. He points out the gross out factor is teh worst and lowest for of horror. Which I have to agree with.

A girl coming out of the TV and getting a phone call saying you're going to die in a week. Seriously, get some guns with armor piercing rounds and barracade yourself in your house, how is that movie supposed to be scary again?

For someone taht is *****ing about escapism for movies you sure as hell back-tracked there. Also, why would bullets work on that thing?

Depends, where do I go?

To your nearest video store. Go get 2001 A Space Odyssey or Bladerunner or Bridge on the River Kwai or Ben Hur. Get some appreciation for some classics learn the difference between a good movie and a bad movie, then come back to me.

Exoricst and Omen movies scary?Don't make me laugh. They have soul, but that isn't going to save a single film from being boring. And for the record I did like the original Amityville, not bashing these films.

Well, I usually don't count any sequel films. So just teh originals. And yea, The Omen and Exorsist are scary as hell.... literally....<.<'

[Gorjirus]

I have to agree with AH here Orga. Most of those movies, aren't that scary. At all.

Back then, to the audiences of the day, sure they could have been. But now, the we are much more hardend (which isn't the word I want, but I can't think of the right one). It takes more to scare us then it did back in the day (I mean, the original black and white Universal Dracula movie? Scared people back in the day. Does jack squat now).

[Orga777]

Originally Posted by Gorjirus

I have to agree with AH here Orga. Most of those movies, aren't that scary. At all.

Back then, to the audiences of the day, sure they could have been. But now, the we are much more hardend (which isn't the word I want, but I can't think of the right one). It takes more to scare us then it did back in the day (I mean, the original black and white Universal Dracula movie? Scared people back in the day. Does jack squat now).

That is usually the case. But I would still say 'Alien' or 'The Exorsist' is scarier than the crap we get now. They don't even go for the scare factor any more.

I have to admit though, besides 'The Thing' (which no matter how many times I see it, still get scared out of my mind) it is hard for me to find many films that actually frighten me any more. Maybe horror is just a dead art now...

[alienhulk2099]

But I would still say 'Alien' or 'The Exorsist' is scarier than the crap we get now.

Those films don't even make me flinch. The trailers for the Saw and Hostel movies are enough to make nightmares.

He may have been caught, but that makes him less evil how?

He wasn't smart enough to get away and do more.

Or the Indiana Jones Trilogy

Boo.

But films that don't TRY like The Mummy or Starship Troopers

The Mummy movies are awesome. That and Starship Troopers has great action in it, corny humor? Maybe (they fixed that up in the second, making it better), but it's still worthy watching. Besides, few arthropods compare to the Hopper Bugs.

Are you serious? Did Titanic, Braveheart, Silence of the Lambs, Lord of the Rings, Shindler's List, Gladiator, Forrest Gump all drop from your mind?

Braveheart was boring, saw little and don't care for Titanic, did not see Schindler's List or Gump. The acadamy awards will occassionally throw in movies people ACTUALLY know to throw them off guard from their rules.

It may have been that way the last couple years

I was assuming since it began.

Unless you think a film like Spider-Man 3 or Transformers deserves a Best Picture nomination when they most certainly DON'T compared to No Country for Old Men or There Will Be Blood.

Sci Fi channel and Asylum movies are better nomination than formers and Spider Man 3. SM3 had too much romance and Formers had so much corny humor in it I prefer Morphers over it for that reason. And to think the only reason I watched it was for fantasy match discussion like most of the movies I've been seeing the past 18 months.

Also, checking RT

What's RT?

He points out the gross out factor is teh worst and lowest for of horror

Not even movies that shouldn't belong in horror to begin with like Matango?

For someone taht is *****ing about escapism for movies you sure as hell back-tracked there.

And for a guy that likes Kaiju movies you are really against action.

Go get 2001 A Space Odyssey or Bladerunner or Bridge on the River Kwai or Ben Hur

Space Odyssey- No interest
Blade Runner- Seen it, had aweful pacing but was watchable otherwise
River Kwai- Never heard of it
Ben Hur- The length alone makes me question

Also, why would bullets work on that thing?

Something eventually will.

[Neo-Crucifer]

Originally Posted by alienhulk2099 on Hannibal Lecter

He wasn't smart enough to get away and do more.

You're a funny man.

[Orga777]

Originally Posted by alienhulk2099

Those films don't even make me flinch. The trailers for the Saw and Hostel movies are enough to make nightmares.

Then you are one sad little man. The only thing I do when I see those trailers is laugh at teh stupidity and the so called 'horror' they are trying to pass it off for.

He wasn't smart enough to get away and do more.

Wait... YES HE DID! Did you even watch teh movie?

Boo.

Well, you really don't have much taste do you? Don't even like Indiana Jones. You are definitely a sad, sad, person.

The Mummy movies are awesome. That and Starship Troopers has great action in it, corny humor? Maybe (they fixed that up in the second, making it better), but it's still worthy watching. Besides, few arthropods compare to the Hopper Bugs.

The movies suck. There is no value in them at all. Especially Starship Troops. A film series so far removed from the source material that it is not only an insult, but laughable.

Braveheart was boring, saw little and don't care for Titanic, did not see Schindler's List or Gump. The acadamy awards will occassionally throw in movies people ACTUALLY know to throw them off guard from their rules.

Except I just listed about 7 films that were just made in recent times. So your logic fails. I could list all the good popular films that got nominations, but I don't think it is worth it. Seriously, if you paid attention, you would know how wrong you really are.

Sci Fi channel and Asylum movies are better nomination than formers and Spider Man 3. SM3 had too much romance and Formers had so much corny humor in it I prefer Morphers over it for that reason. And to think the only reason I watched it was for fantasy match discussion like most of the movies I've been seeing the past 18 months.

Oh... my... god... Seriously, you do NOT deserve to watch film.

What's RT?

Rotten Tomatoes.

Not even movies that shouldn't belong in horror to begin with like Matango?

Matango is just creepy. Also, that movie messes with your brain. It is not so much horror as a psychological thriller.

And for a guy that likes Kaiju movies you are really against action.

I am not against action. If that was the case I wouldn't consider The Dark Knight the best movie of 2008 so far. Or consider the new Indiana Jones a disgrace while I revere the original films. I just like GOOD action films with heart to them. As for Godzilla films, if you actually followed what I usually say, my favorites are usually the least action packed films. Which is why Gojira, Godzilla 1985, Mothra vs. Godzilla, and GMK are my favorites while I consider Space Godzilla, Megalon, GFW, and Godzilla vs. Mecha-Godzilla are some of my least favorites and which I consider to be garbage for the most part.

Space Odyssey- No interest

Boo. It is the best Science fiction film made man.

Blade Runner- Seen it, had aweful pacing but was watchable otherwise

Boo. Bladerunner's pacing had no such problem.

River Kwai- Never heard of it

Boo. It is one of the best war films ever made.

Ben Hur- The length alone makes me question

Well... it IS really long... which does hurt it... but it is still fantastic in every way.

[Gorjirus]

Originally Posted by Orga777

That is usually the case. But I would still say 'Alien' or 'The Exorsist' is scarier than the crap we get now. They don't even go for the scare factor any more.

I have to admit though, besides 'The Thing' (which no matter how many times I see it, still get scared out of my mind) it is hard for me to find many films that actually frighten me any more. Maybe horror is just a dead art now...

Exorsist, possibly. But Alien? Sorry, but I don't think that is scary at all any more.

The Thing, is pretty good.

It isn't that Horror is dead, its that we aren't scared.

Think about it. We have seen more actual "horror" than any group ever before us, thanks to the media and internet. If you pay attention to "local" news on TV, you can see upwards of 100 murders before you are a teenager. If you pay attention to naitonal news, we (our age) have seen the original Gulf War, all the bombings in the 90's, 9/11, and the subsequint action in Afgahnistan and Iraq.

I mean, seriously. If you (universal you) watched 9/11 when it happened, what on a screen, that we know is fake, could really scare us?

Numbed. Numbed is a much better word.

Then , the internet, where you can see pretty much anything. All the blood and guts you get in "scary" movies, excpet that they are real.

You can read about the exploits of the worlds worst. Murderers, rapists, cannibals, torture, anything. What possible fiction could we find that can be more horrifying than reality?

[Orga777]

Originally Posted by Gorjirus

Exorsist, possibly. But Alien? Sorry, but I don't think that is scary at all any more.

Actually, I still find the chest bursting scene to be creepy... and Ash... Ash was freaking insane... But yeah, other than that, I agree.

It isn't that Horror is dead, its that we aren't scared.

Think about it. We have seen more actual "horror" than any group ever before us, thanks to the media and internet. If you pay attention to "local" news on TV, you can see upwards of 100 murders before you are a teenager. If you pay attention to naitonal news, we (our age) have seen the original Gulf War, all the bombings in the 90's, 9/11, and the subsequint action in Afgahnistan and Iraq.

I mean, seriously. If you (universal you) watched 9/11 when it happened, what on a screen, that we know is fake, could really scare us?

Numbed. Numbed is a much better word.

Then , the internet, where you can see pretty much anything. All the blood and guts you get in "scary" movies, excpet that they are real.

You can read about the exploits of the worlds worst. Murderers, rapists, cannibals, torture, anything. What possible fiction could we find that can be more horrifying than reality?

You know Gor, I agree 100%. You put it together nicely.

[Gorjirus]

Boo. It is the best Science fiction film made man.

I read the book, I doubt the movie could live up to it, making it lose points.

That, and Star Trek II.

Well... it IS really long... which does hurt it... but it is still fantastic in every way.

YES BEN HUR IS AMAZING. B/C IT HAS CHARLTON HESTON IN IT.

[Orga777]

Originally Posted by Gorjirus

I read the book, I doubt the movie could live up to it, making it lose points.

That, and Star Trek II.

Go worship Star Trek someplace else.
But yeah, the book is better, but the movie came first (well, at the same time.) And I still prefer the film over the book in this case. Which is a rarity in itself.

YES BEN HUR IS AMAZING. B/C IT HAS CHARLTON HESTON IN IT.

THIS IS FACT!

[alienhulk2099]

Wait... YES HE DID!

Took him long enough.

Don't even like Indiana Jones. You are definitely a sad, sad, person.

Odd, I don't feel depressed about not liking highly over rated actors in highly over rated films with more cliches than Asylum movies. you fail.

There is no value in them at all.

laughable.

Contradiction, tisk tisk.

Except I just listed about 7 films that were just made in recent times.

I'm pretty sure most of those films weren't made in the last 7 years, so they can count as old.

Rotten Tomatoes

I don't take anyone that gives Deck The Halls an extremely low score seriously.

Matango is just creepy.

Also, that movie messes with your brain.

By boring you?

It is not so much horror as a psychological thriller.

Then it's a thriller not horror......In fact it shouldn't even count as thriller, nothing thrilling about it.

It is the best Science fiction film made man.

Pretty sure stuff like The Faculty, Screamers, Metamorphasis: Alien Factor, Garuda, Ice Crawlers, Eye of the Beast, Shapeshifter, Rock Monster, AI Assault, Supergator, AVP: Requiem, The Car, Ghosts of Mars, Night Breed, etc. all make better films then some people going to Jupiter, take pictures, and as they're coming back have to deactivate HAL 9000.

Bladerunner's pacing had no such problem.

If it didn't how come it got brought up?

my favorites are usually the least action packed films.

Odd, except for Final Wars those are the ones I consider lower. And for the record FW is my least favorite Godzilla movie, yes Godzilla 98 counts on that list.

What possible fiction could we find that can be more horrifying than reality?

Hellraiser
Rawhead Rex
Saw (trailer alone)
Hostel (trailer alone)
Jaw Breaker (a clip I once saw)
The Fog (79)
See No Evil (trailer alone)

some other movies I'm forgetting.

[Orga777]

Originally Posted by alienhulk2099

Took him long enough.

He escaped at the end of the movie... Yeah, you never saw it did you?

Odd, I don't feel depressed about not liking highly over rated actors in highly over rated films with more cliches than Asylum movies. you fail.

No. YOU fail. You fail big time. I have met people with no taste before, but damn, you take the cake. Seriously, Asylum films? You MUST be joking?

Contradiction, tisk tisk.

No it isn't. Laughable as in it has no redeeming value that it is laughable.

I'm pretty sure most of those films weren't made in the last 7 years, so they can count as old.

Your point? They are still recent times. Also, films in general in the last seven years have been mediocre in the mainstream department.

I don't take anyone that gives Deck The Halls an extremely low score seriously.

Deck the Halls sucked dude.

By boring you?

It was boring in what way?

Then it's a thriller not horror......In fact it shouldn't even count as thriller, nothing thrilling about it.

Pretty sure stuff like The Faculty, Screamers, Metamorphasis: Alien Factor, Garuda, Ice Crawlers, Eye of the Beast, Shapeshifter, Rock Monster, AI Assault, Supergator, AVP: Requiem, The Car, Ghosts of Mars, Night Breed, etc. all make better films then some people going to Jupiter, take pictures, and as they're coming back have to deactivate HAL 9000.

It is official. You are an idiot with the brain compacity of a ten year old. I am sorry, normally I don't say things like that, but it is warranted here. For one thing that is NOT what happens in 2001 at all. Second, that list... makes me want to puke.

If it didn't how come it got brought up?

You brought it up. The pacing was not a problem at all. How can you even say something like that?

Odd, except for Final Wars those are the ones I consider lower. And for the record FW is my least favorite Godzilla movie, yes Godzilla 98 counts on that list.

Of course you consider them lower. You can't think at all.

Hellraiser

I agree here.

Rawhead Rex
Saw (trailer alone)
Hostel (trailer alone)
Jaw Breaker (a clip I once saw)
The Fog (79)
See No Evil (trailer alone)

Ha... no.

[alienhulk2099]

He escaped at the end of the movie

Pretty sure it was in the middle.

I have met people with no taste before, but damn, you take the cake.

If I had no taste why do I like kaiju films?

Also, films in general in the last seven years have been mediocre in the mainstream department.

I don't know, the Star Wars prequels were pretty darn awesome.

Asylum films? You MUST be joking?

I'm not.

Deck the Halls sucked dude.

In what way? It was perfect for a holiday movie.

It was boring in what way?

How about all the talking and no one even saying anything about there being strange creatures on the island. They don't even bother escaping.

For one thing that is NOT what happens in 2001 at all

I'm certain that the movie had HAL 9000 running wild and they had to shut him down.

Second, that list... makes me want to puke

Explain how.

The pacing was not a problem at all. How can you even say something like that?

Because I'm not the guy that just listen to critics without question and just accept something. Yes, the pacing was aweful, but it wasn't as bad as movies like Shark Swarm.

You can't think at all.

If I was incapable of thinking we wouldn't have this conversation.

[Orga777]

Originally Posted by alienhulk2099

If I had no taste why do I like kaiju films?

You don't even like the quality kaiju films. So that means your taste is just horrid on all levels.

I don't know, the Star Wars prequels were pretty darn awesome.

HAHAHAHAHA! No. The Star Wars prequels are garbage and tarnished the Star Wars legacy.

In what way? It was perfect for a holiday movie.

Except it wasn't funny, was stupid, and was just a poor film in general.

How about all the talking and no one even saying anything about there being strange creatures on the island. They don't even bother escaping.

This just goes to show you have no capacity to think. If you watched the film, they didn't KNOW that there were giant walking mushrooms. And they DID try to escape.

I'm certain that the movie had HAL 9000 running wild and they had to shut him down.

Except there was a reason behind it and it was also NOT the main plot you dim-wit.

Explain how.

Because AVP:R is on that list with a bunch of garbage Sci-Fi original movies as well as other trashy unoriginal films.

Because I'm not the guy that just listen to critics without question and just accept something. Yes, the pacing was aweful, but it wasn't as bad as movies like Shark Swarm.

Except you are wrong. The pacing works in the movie.

If I was incapable of thinking we wouldn't have this conversation.

I don't consider this a conversation. I consider it me talking to a void of logic. Which has to stop. I leave the topic now. Good day sir.

[alienhulk2099]

You don't even like the quality kaiju films

Godzilla vs. Biollante is my favorite, Monster Zero is my favorite in the showa series. You were saying?

No.

Yes.

The Star Wars prequels are garbage and tarnished the Star Wars legacy.

How?

Except it wasn't funny

No.

And they DID try to escape

They did a really poor job of doing it.

Because AVP:R is on that list with a bunch of garbage Sci-Fi original movies as well as other trashy unoriginal films.

How are they trashy? It's on a low budget, so what? And Sci Fi films do put effort into their films, otherwise they'd be delayed and never see the light of day.

Except you are wrong. The pacing works in the movie.

No it didn't.

I don't consider this a conversation. I consider it me talking to a void of logic.

Then why did you start it?

[Husnock]

So basically you're just overpoweredgodzilla with the added ability to articulate a sentence better, then...

Originally Posted by alienhulk2099

Yes.

I'jm suprised Morgoth hasn't stomed in here and ripped you limb from limb for that.

How?

You watched them, right? I dare say that Ep1 was almost if not just as bad as the Holdiay Special. At least that was blessedly short.

No.

YES.

How are they trashy? It's on a low budget, so what? And Sci Fi films do put effort into their films, otherwise they'd be delayed and never see the light of day.

AVP:R had a PredAlien that was RAPING AND IMPREGNATING PREGNANT WOMEN and then KILLING NEWBORN BABIES. The director of that film isn't just a bad director, he's a SICK, PERVERTED MONSTER.

Then why did you start it?

Because you've gradually been showing less and less intelligence as this topic has gone on. Frankly, I don't want to carry it on either (and this is only my first post). You obviously have neither taste nor common sense and CANNOT be reasoned with. Good day, sir.

[Gorjirus]

AVP:R had a PredAlien that was RAPING AND IMPREGNATING PREGNANT WOMEN and then KILLING NEWBORN BABIES. The director of that film isn't just a bad director, he's a SICK, PERVERTED MONSTER.

I liked AVP: R.

[alienhulk2099]

AVP:R had a PredAlien that was RAPING AND IMPREGNATING PREGNANT WOMEN and then KILLING NEWBORN BABIES. The director of that film isn't just a bad director, he's a SICK, PERVERTED MONSTER.

As much as I like AVP:R, yes Hunsock, that scene was unnecessary and disturbing. However, why bring down an entire film for that one scene?